« Moses Is Dead. | HOME PAGE | Round Up the Usual Suspects! »



April 08, 2008

What Happened in Urumqi?

With Tibet still mostly off-limits to journalists, it seems like everyone and their mamma has been having a go at Xinjiang. Which is good, but... well, we feel a little bit like a backup date for the prom.

Just when questions about the alleged January 27 raid on a terrorist cell in Urumqi were fading into oblivion, AFP has stirred things up with some solid on-the-ground reporting:

Weapons, explosives and militant Islamic literature were allegedly seized in the raid, which made world headlines for its implications on Olympic security.

Strangely, however, it went largely unnoticed at Happiness Garden, whose flats are so tightly packed it would be difficult to keep anything from the neighbours.

The Uighur resident said he watched a van pull up, from which several men in plain clothes emerged, later escorting two people from the building and into the van.

There was no gunfire or explosions, he said.

His account was backed by at least one other resident, an ethnic Han Chinese woman. More than a dozen neighbours who were eager to discuss the case said they heard and saw nothing.

"It's very quiet here. Everybody would have heard something like that," said the Chinese woman.

Hmmmm. For anyone who's lived in a typical Chinese apartment block, you can probably imagine that grenades being thrown somewhere in the neighborhood wouldn't go unnoticed. Hell, you can hear people setting off firecrackers for miles around during Spring Festival, the blasts bouncing off the walls through China's endless concrete jungle.

The question now is whether or not there will be a response to the allegation implicit in the article that someone isn't being 100% truthful about the Happiness Garden incident. (And what about that equally odd attempt to bring down an airliner with gasoline?)

On the bright side for the Chinese government, at least one resident expressed his supreme faith in the state:

"They captured a whole bunch of terrorists and there was a big fight," declared a Chinese man in his 50s who lives adjacent to the raid site, although he soon admitted learning of the raid only later from state media reports.

"The government said so. They would not lie," he said.

Someone, please pin a flag on that fine gentleman.

Months later, Xinjiang 'terror' raid remains a mystery

URUMQI, China (AFP) — Mystery continues to surround official reports of a deadly raid in Urumqi that saved the Beijing Olympics from a terrorist attack.

As China tells it, police burst into the Happiness Garden apartments in this northwestern city and raided a fourth-floor flat where "terrorists" were holed up.

But that's news to residents of the quiet middle-class compound in the dusty and remote Xinjiang region.

"No, no, no. There was nothing like that. That's nonsense," said a local resident, a member of the Muslim ethnic Uighur minority, when asked about the dramatic official version of the January 27 raid.

The man, whose name has been withheld to protect him from possible reprisals, was one of more than a dozen residents to question Chinese reports that Beijing said proved a terror threat in vast, heavily Muslim Xinjiang.

In an ensuing clash described by state-controlled press and Xinjiang's top Communist Party official, Wang Lequan, militants threw grenades at police, injuring seven officers.

Eventually, two militants were killed and another 15 captured by police.

Weapons, explosives and militant Islamic literature were allegedly seized in the raid, which made world headlines for its implications on Olympic security.

Strangely, however, it went largely unnoticed at Happiness Garden, whose flats are so tightly packed it would be difficult to keep anything from the neighbours.

The Uighur resident said he watched a van pull up, from which several men in plain clothes emerged, later escorting two people from the building and into the van.

There was no gunfire or explosions, he said.

His account was backed by at least one other resident, an ethnic Han Chinese woman. More than a dozen neighbours who were eager to discuss the case said they heard and saw nothing.

"It's very quiet here. Everybody would have heard something like that," said the Chinese woman.

AFP contacted the police station that has jurisdiction over Happiness Garden, as well as the regional police headquarters and the Public Security Ministry in Beijing for more information about the raid.

None gave any comment.

China has released only bare details of the raid -- and of separate allegations of a failed attempt by a Uighur woman to blow up a Chinese airliner flying from Urumqi to Beijing on March 7.

Exiled Uighur leader Rebiya Kadeer last month called both plots fabrications.

"The real goal of the Chinese government is to organise a terrorist attack so that it can increase its crackdown on the Uighur people," said Kadeer, 61, the head of the Uyghur American Association, now in the United States after serving a Chinese jail term.

Xinjiang's roughly 8 million Uighurs, a central Asian, Turkic-speaking people, have long bridled under nearly six decades of Chinese rule.

Nicolas Bequelin, a China researcher with Human Rights Watch, said he doubted Xinjiang authorities would completely fabricate a terror cell, but added there was pressure from Beijing for local results on terrorism with the August Olympics approaching.

"Certainly the government is keen to emphasise the terror risk in Xinjiang and paint everything with the same brush. Criminal activity is often crudely conflated with terrorism," he told AFP.

"China has muddied the waters on this so much that it is impossible to know the truth."

Real or not, the plots have led to tightening police control, Urumqi residents told AFP.

"It is very tense. There is more police activity, more people being taken away," said Jelil Aziz, a businessman who said his own brother was held by police for several days last month.

China's policy of encouraging Han Chinese migration to the region has caused an economic boom but also Uighur complaints of a creeping elimination of their culture and discrimination in business and education.

If nothing else, the alleged terror raid has highlighted these divisions.

Most ethnic Chinese questioned by AFP believed government accounts, while Uighurs were skeptical, contradicting China's claims that its many ethnic groups live in harmony.

"They captured a whole bunch of terrorists and there was a big fight," declared a Chinese man in his 50s who lives adjacent to the raid site, although he soon admitted learning of the raid only later from state media reports.

"The government said so. They would not lie," he said.

A local Uighur resident, one of many who noted the difficulty of hiding 17 terrorists in Happiness Gardens' tiny flats, took a different view.

"It's what the government says, but does that make it true?" asked the woman, whose name was withheld by AFP.

"There is no way to know for sure."

blog_sig.gif

posted April 08, 2008 at 03:33 PM unofficial Xinjiang time | HaoHao This!

Comments

So, how long before someone claims this was biased reporting?

Posted by: China-Matt at April 8, 2008 05:13 PM

Things that make you go "hmmmmmm"

Posted by: Lucas at April 8, 2008 06:25 PM

It would be disingenuous of me to claim that this comes as a great surprise. I wonder what the glorious protectors of China have to say about this sad little fact?

Posted by: jimba at April 8, 2008 06:57 PM

For such events I only care about if anyone get killed. What xinhua had said is of the least concern. Living in China helps develop immunity to political propaganda.

Posted by: gao at April 8, 2008 10:43 PM

I wonder when they'll start restricting journalists' visits to Xinjiang? Meanwhile, hooray for prom backup dates!!

Posted by: Weeger at April 9, 2008 12:01 AM

I doubt the PRC will too heavily restrict on journalist visits to Xinjiang. The Uighurs don't have the built in sympathy that the Tibetans do, and any unrest there will not hurt the PRC the same way unrest in Tibet did. The fact that the ETIM is considered by the US to be a terrorist organization--and it is*, let's be clear, albeit a somewhat ineffective one--is of enormous benefit to China.

Of course, once it gets out that the Uighurs are Sufi there will be plenty of New Age bullshit surrounding them. assuming, of course, New Agers know what Sufism is.

Posted by: Tiako at April 9, 2008 02:38 AM

What current, credible evidence supports the claim that ETIM even exists today?


Posted by: Weeger at April 9, 2008 07:48 AM

China says it exists therefore it does.

Actually a clever move by them to conflate all groups using the name "Eastern Turkestan" with this terrorist imaginary. As we know many Uyghur Independence Groups of all persuasions incorporate this territorial designation. And the indeppend3ent republics of the 1930s and 1940s within the territory of present Xinjiang all used this name: ETR, TIRET.

Now any one group using the 'east turkestan' identifier is a terrorist group - a member of the ETIM. Convenient. Maybe a shadowy group did exist using that name, mainly operating in Pakistan- their leader Mahsud Hussain was killed by Pakistani troops along with other Uyghur freedom fighters training in the tribal areas near Afghnistan several years ago. If they did in fact use this name, who really knows - but it has now been applied to all Uyghur seperatist groups of all persuasions. A nice and handy imaginary conglomerate. James

Posted by: James at April 9, 2008 02:39 PM

True that James. Not the same James who wrote a paper on violent separatism in Xinjiang. A similar line was argued... which I argeed with.

Posted by: Jimba at April 10, 2008 01:37 PM

Yu are right Jimba. I am James the second not James the First. The issue of the ETIM is as slippery as it comes.

Posted by: James at April 10, 2008 03:25 PM

Whoops, it was a question rather than a presumption. But, you answered it anyway.

Posted by: jimba at April 10, 2008 03:31 PM

Post a comment (click "post", wait, reload page to see comment):




Remember Me?
Please enter this number (spam prevention):


(you may use HTML tags for style)